| |||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuniq TX-2 Performance Thermal Paste
Testing will be Test Bed ASUS P5N32-E SLI mainboard Intel Core 2 Duo 6600 (2.4GHz) @ 3.0GHz -
1.51 volts (2) 1GB
OCZ PC2-6400 Ti Memory (4-4-4-15)
@ DDR2-867 250MB Western Digital Caviar SE SATA II HDD Generic 16x DVD-RW drive Windows XP Pro with all service packs
installed Open rack mounting Results
Conclusion To put things in perspective, if one cooler
bested another by four degrees Celsius, people would be singing from the
rooftops. For load temperature results to drop over four degrees
Celsius by changing the kind of thermal paste you use is equally admirable.
We didn't see a huge difference between the Tuniq and the ThermalRight paste
but it was there. The reengineering of the TX-2 was certainly
worthwhile. For the performance user or the regular Joe,
switching over to a high end thermal paste is a no brainer. Not only
can a noticeable performance gain be achieved but you also don't have to
worry about popping your cooler off in six months to re-grease. Our
thanks go out to Sunbeam and Tuniq for sponsoring this review of a very
worthwhile product. You can find the Tuniq TX-2 Paste here at
NewEgg. Pros Superior thermal conductivity Not electrically conductive Spreads easy - clean consistency Reasonably priced Won't break down over time Performs on par with the competition Cons Performs on par with the competition
|
|
|
All rights reserved. All
pages Copyright © 2000 - 2008 by R. Dean Barker.
|